Joshua Laufer
5/3/2013
The
1911 Triangle Factory Fire’s Effects on The US Working Class
The purpose of this
paper is to examine the Triangle Factory Fire in 1911. Primary
emphasis will be given toward managerial negligence, hazardous
working conditions, economic oppression, and the new demand for
safer, fairer labor conditions. The goal is to provide a conceptual
overview of these factors, and the relationships therein with regard
to the United States working class.
The
Triangle Waist Company was a factory in the early 1900s. Located in
Manhattan, the garment factory owners subcontracted the jobs to
people who hired workers, and took a part of the profit. Two years
prior to the fire, an incident known as the Uprising of the 20,000
caused 400 working employees to leave the scene. A developing group
of middle-class white women known as The Women’s Trade Union League
assisted the female workers to picket.1 A year later,
the strike would lead to an agreement in the garment industry
providing for a grievance system. The structure of the agreement
involved raising the wages of workers, improving working conditions,
and lowering the amount of hours.
Sadly
for the employees, not all the garment companies were willing to
accept the agreement. Unprincipled managers of the Triangle Waist
Company chose to run the factory 1
under their own
rules. Many immigrants who may not have received full documentation,
and wanted to stay out of the eyes of the government would be drawn
to working in the industry; those in charge knew the work was
desperately needed regardless of the unfair conditions.
On a typical work
day, around closing time, a fire on the top floor of one of the
buildings took 141 lives of the 500 employed at the Triangle Waist
Company. The New York Times wrote, “Three stories of a ten-floor
building at the corner of Northwest Green Street and Washington place
was burned last evening between the hours of 4:40 and 7 o’clock,
and while the fire was going on, 141 young men and women—at least
125 of them mere girls, were burned to death or killed by jumping to
the pavement below.”
The
victims on the top floors could not escape due to flames blocking the
stairwell. They were left with the choice to burn to death, suffocate
from the smoke, or jump from the ninth floor down to the New York
City sidewalks where people at the incident were said to be shouting
for the workers to not jump.
In the midst of the
horrifying event, this did not stop me from taking the leap down.
Taken directly from the New York Times headlines on March 26, 1911,
the day after the fire occurred, an excerpt captures a glimpse of the
intensity of the scene. The girls rushed to the windows and looked
down at Greene Street, 100 feet below them. Then one poor, little
creature jumped. There was a plate glass protection over part of
the sidewalk, but she crashed through it, wrecking it and breaking
her body into a thousand pieces.”2
The
fire was said to have burned down all three floors within a
half-hour. The victims had little time, and nearly no available
options to escape the burning flames, and thick toxic fumes. The
managerial powers during this time were able to take complete
advantage of the workers. Most of those employed at the triangle
factory were young Jewish, and Italian women. Already struggling to
cope with the language and culture of America, these new immigrants
were perfect prey for those hiring. Little concern was put into how
well the workers would be handled inside their own workplace:
managers instructed as they pleased, knowing that those who spoke out
could be easily replaced due to the high demand for jobs.
For the workers in
many garment factories, including the Triangle company, managers
would lock the workers in, disallowing them from going to the
bathroom, or taking any sort of break. According to an article from
the ILR school at Cornell University, “They and many others
afterwards believed they were deliberately locked—owners had
frequently locked the exit doors in the past, claiming that workers
stole materials.” The failure of management to compensate for the
worker’s safety can be linked to the high death toll at the factory
fire.
From
an article that contains a sixty-year-old man reflecting back during
the early 1900’s, “Millions of immigrants poured into the cities,
trying to get jobs and make a better life.”3
Despite the terrible
conditions put out by the hands of management; ultimately, it was
never a necessity to make any changes for the highly sought after and
necessary jobs. Due to the higher economic status, and therefore
reputation of the owners, workers knew that by speaking up against
the unfairness of the circumstances, they faced the risk of being
exploited, and possibly losing out on future jobs. Management took
full leverage in knowing that these immigrants seeking out jobs for a
more fulfilling life would be desperate.
The
suffrage of the workers did not stop with their careless management.
A trickling effect from the owner’s negligence resulted in highly
hazardous working conditions and extremely low wages. The occurrence
of the factory fire revealed the inefficiencies of fire inspections
at the turn of the twentieth century. “For all practical purposes,
the ninth floor fire escape in the Asch Building led nowhere,
certainly not to safety, and it bent under the weight of the factory
workers trying to escape the inferno.” Workers faced long days
inside unsafe buildings, bad ventilation with overcrowded rooms, and
as mentioned, sometimes even being locked in.
Like
many sweatshops at this time, the Triangle Factory was known to be
unsanitary, containing too many people inside one room, and foul
smelling. Workers were lucky if they were paid minimum wage. An
excerpt from an article by Eyewitness to History recalls the events
by those who directly lived it. “An old Italian saying summed up
the disillusionment felt by many: ‘I came to America because I
heard the streets were paved with gold. When I got here, found out
three things: First, the streets weren't paved with gold; second,
they weren't paved at all: and third, I was expected to pave them.’”4
It is well known that immigrants perceived America in the nineteenth
century as a place filled with opportunity, and a potentially
well-fulfilled life. The quote exemplifies a common misconception
that many immigrants had of what the American Dream truly was.
It
is apparent that the working class faced economic hardships,
hazardous working conditions, and a lack of managerial efficiency.
The Triangle Factory Fire was a historical event that heavily
influenced the development of trends toward safer working conditions.
Groups like the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, as
mentioned earlier, and the Women’s Trade Union League formed to
protect the workers, and to strive toward more suitable workplace
conditions.
The
fire was a major turning point for the beginning of newly-formed
unions to protect employees. The tragedy had a major impact on the
way all garment factories were to be run in the future. In an excerpt
from Samuel Gompers, “...the last convincing point in evidence was
reached of the lawlessness, the unrestrained avarice, the merciless
disregard of human life which for more than a decade has marked the
concentration of clothing manufacture under the control of employers
directing the work of hundreds or thousands of employees, who were
meantime taking advantage of every means possible to reduce wages and
deprive their employees of the protection of the law or the trade
union.”5
The
Triangle Factory Fire exploited the company’s hazardous working
conditions and demonstrated a catastrophic outcome. Along with the
mistreatment from overhead and low wages, the demand for worker’s
protection and rights in the garment factories would begin to
circulate around newer industries. The impact ultimately had a
positive effect on the United States working class’s right to
unionize, and protect themselves from potential abuses of power.
1
Sione,
Patricia, Sweatshops and Strikes of 1911, 1998,
http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/trianglefire/story/sweatshopsStrikes.html.
(accessed 02, May, 2013).
2 N.A., 141 Men and Girls Die in Waist Factory Fire; Trapped High Up in Washington Place Building; Street Strewn with Bodies; Piles of Dead Inside (New York Times, New York, 1911) p. 1
3 "Immigration in the early 1900s," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2000) (accessed 02, May, 2013).
4 "City Life at the turn of the 20th Century," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2000). (accessed 02, May, 2013).
5 Samuel Gompers, Hostile Employers See Yourselves as Others Know You, (American Federationist, N.A., 1911) p, 365-61.
2 N.A., 141 Men and Girls Die in Waist Factory Fire; Trapped High Up in Washington Place Building; Street Strewn with Bodies; Piles of Dead Inside (New York Times, New York, 1911) p. 1
3 "Immigration in the early 1900s," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2000) (accessed 02, May, 2013).
4 "City Life at the turn of the 20th Century," EyeWitness to History, www.eyewitnesstohistory.com (2000). (accessed 02, May, 2013).
5 Samuel Gompers, Hostile Employers See Yourselves as Others Know You, (American Federationist, N.A., 1911) p, 365-61.
No comments:
Post a Comment