Claire
Doherty
3/24/2013
3/24/2013
Working Class
Women’s Contribution to the “War Effort”
The
United States’ entrance into World War II called upon all American
people—men and women, young and old-- to aid in the war effort. The
war not only required men and women to work overseas, but take on new
work on the home front as well. Once the number of military
volunteers decreased and the draft was set in motion, the male
population began to dwindle rather quickly. Women, mostly from the
working class, were called upon to fill the positions of those men
who had left for war. Before the war, the majority of women who
worked were often young and single. Once the war began, however,
women of all ages, both married and single flooded into the
workplace. Contributing to the war effort was incredibly important to
many women. According to the National WWII Museum of New Orleans,
“not only did they give their sons, husbands, fathers, and brothers
to the war effort, they gave their time, energy, and some even gave
their lives.”
This paper will focus on the women who made up the wartime working
class during the early 1940s and will detail their contributions to
the war effort, their personal achievements, and the government’s
treatment and recruitment of these women workers.
Initially,
because of the common belief that women, especially married women,
should not work in the industries that now required their labor, the
government and individual companies had to find ways to make manual
labor more acceptable for women. Propaganda, as it turned out, was
the answer to this dilemma. Used most often to instill a sense of
patriotism, war propaganda spread like wild fire throughout the
United States. In a pamphlet distributed to the people of Mobile,
Alabama by the War Manpower Commission, a commission given the task
of recruiting more women into the workforce, the Commission attempted
to frighten women into the workplace by evoking the image of Hitler
and the threat he presented to the American people:
If
Hitler came to Mobile, every woman would defend her home with a gun,
a knife or her bare fingers…Hitler and his hordes will not come if
women help to build ships, more ships to transport our men, tanks,
planes and munitions to the battle lines on other Continents – or
if women take other jobs directly aiding the war effort.3
One
of the most famous icons to emerge from the propaganda of World War
II was Rosie the Riveter, a woman wearing a work shirt and bandanna,
flexing her bicep. Rosie the Riveter, along with her signature phrase
“We Can Do It,” became a national symbol and the epitome of what
an American woman factory worker looked like during the war.
The government’s
emphasis on the necessity of women taking jobs to assist in the war
effort was a complete contradiction to the idea of the “traditional
female role”, or the belief that women were meant to remain within
the domestic sphere.4
According to a pamphlet titled “Womanpower,” fifty four percent
of husbands claimed they were opposed to the suggestion that their
wives should take jobs.
It was not just husbands who were unhappy with the idea of their
wives entering the workforce, but in fact, the majority of the male
population was displeased with it despite the general need for more
workers. Some women were even accused of stealing jobs that
rightfully belonged to men. “Womanpower” was actually geared
towards both men and women. It even states, “the information
campaigns must convince…the men that women are needed in war jobs,”
as well as convince “the husbands that their wives (if they have no
young children) should take war jobs.”6
Though men’s negative feelings towards women taking jobs in
traditionally masculine industries remained, the existence of such
government propaganda demonstrated that the prospect of a more equal
working future between the genders was not so farfetched.
Despite
the opposition of men, working women responded to the wartime labor
shortage and the significant increase in wages that came along with
it. Women streamed into the factories and shipyards, and worked in
manufacturing jobs that had always been traditionally male
occupations. Many performed physically hard labor, and a few women
were even trained in what can be considered skilled labor. Comparable
to the image of Rosie the Riveter, the majority of these women were
proud to be aiding in the war effort and many women remember their
time in the war plants fondly. Delana Jensen Close was one of the
many women who worked in a war plant. Born in Utah, Close moved to
California and began working at the Yuba Manufacturing Company
building artillery pieces.7
She describes working with the manufacturing company during the war
as “living
in a special time and place. There was an energy in the air and in
the people. We were wanted and needed and important to the war
effort.”8
Close’s description of this sense of unity among the workers shows
that the gender roles of the 1940s were not forgotten, but were at
least set aside in order to benefit the war industry.
Because
wages during World War II more than doubled that of what they had
been, some women were able to save a fair amount of their income.
Along with their savings and their purchasing of war bonds, these
women prospered and a few were even able to purchase houses or start
small businesses once the war ended. According to the National
Archives of Atlanta, “these women had saved much of their wages
since there was little to buy during the war. It was this money that
helped serve as a down payment for a new home and helped launch the
prosperity of the 1950s.”9
Donna Jean Harvey, who worked at several different factories
throughout the war, was able to save enough of her wages to open a
beauty salon after the war had ended.10
Being able to save enough to open a beauty salon or even for a down
payment on a house was a huge accomplishment for a woman of the
working class.
The
influx of women into the workplace during World War II also
introduced the possibility of gender equality and financial
independence without the stigma of being a woman in a male dominated
place of work. While many women continued to choose to marry at young
ages, especially during the war, the higher wages presented by the
manufacturing industry offered working class women the option of
remaining unmarried and therefore not dependent upon spouses. It is
unlikely that a young woman in the 1940s would choose independence
because of the ever-present gender expectations, but even just having
the opportunity seemed like an achievement. Gender equality remained
an elusive goal, but during the war, as Delana Jensen Close implies,
there was a sense of unity among all industrial workers. The effects
were not immediate, but these women paved the way for future
generations of working women.
Unfortunately
for the women of the working class, once the war had ended they were
expected to forfeit their new jobs and higher wages to the men
returning home in a process historians have called “reconversion.”
Because the women who worked in manufacturing during World War II had
been deemed as only essential to the war effort, they were often laid
off and encouraged to either enter more acceptable female
occupations, like teaching or secretarial work, or to resume more
conventional roles for women, like mothers and homemakers. These
women may have returned to more “traditional” roles, but for a
short time they had succeeded in breaking the social norms, which
would lead to greater triumphs in the future. According to archived
American Documents at Glasgow University,
Despite
postwar setbacks, women continued to enter the work force during the
1940s and 1950s, especially in traditionally female jobs, working as
production line operatives or in the clerical, teaching, or health
fields. Most important, the wartime work experience of women
demonstrated that they were capable of an expanded role in society,
which stimulated the feminist movement of the 1950s.11
Those
women who did not give up their jobs after the war, were frowned upon
by the majority of the American people. In critics’ eyes,
manufacturing jobs rightly belonged to men, and any woman who
remained was taking labor opportunities away from men who where
better suited to the work.
As
a result of World War II, women were able to break into traditionally
masculine industries such as the aircraft manufacturing industry. The
government’s attempt to bring more women into the workforce
resulted in a somewhat softened attitude towards women laborers for
the duration of the war. The labor opportunities working class women
enjoyed during the war opened a whole world of possibilities, and
proved to them that “when given a chance, women were capable of
performing in the work place as well as men.”12
Even though the women who entered the manufacturing industry during
this period were merely the temporary solution to the labor shortage
caused by the war, their brief but important introduction to the
labor force proved that they were capable of doing much more than
what was conventionally expected of them.
The National WWII
Museum of New Orleans, "American Women in World War II: On the
Home Front and Beyond,” Women
in WWII at a Glance,
http://www.nationalww2museum.org/learn/education/for-students/ww2-history/at-a-glance/women-in-ww2.html.
National Archives
at Atlanta, "Women in the Work Force during World War II,"
World War II,
http://www.archives.gov/atlanta/education/resources-by-state/wwii-women.html.
33
War Manpower Commission, "War Manpower job flyer promoting
women to register for War Jobs, 1942,” World
War II, National
Archive at Atlanta,
http://www.archives.gov/atlanta/education/resources-by-state/wwii-women.html.
44
National Archives at Glasgow
University, "Women in Industry During World War II,"
America in the 1930s
and 1940s,
http://www.arts.gla.ac.uk/CAS/HISTORY/AmericaLevel2/Women/women.htm.
National Archives
at Atlanta, “Women in
the Work Force during World War II."
66
National Archives at Atlanta, "Womanpower,” World
War II,
http://www.archives.gov/atlanta/education/resources-by-state/wwii-women.html.
77
Delana Jensen Close, “Delana Jensen Close,” Rosie
the Riveter: Women Working During World War II.
National Park Services,
http://www.nps.gov/pwro/collection/website/delana.htm
88
Delana Jensen Close, “Delana Jensen Close.”
99
National Archives of Atlanta, "Women in the Work Force during
World War II."
1010
Donna Jean Harvey, “Donna Jean Harvey,” Rosie
the Riveter: Women Working During World War II. National
Park Services, http://www.nps.gov/pwro/collection/website/donna.htm
1111
National Archives at Glasgow University, "Women in Industry
During World War II,"
1212
National Archives at Glasgow University, "Women in Industry
During World War II,"
No comments:
Post a Comment